|
Nevada, Missouri ~ Friday, August 29, 2008
| Blogs |
|
|
Meth Watch
Posted Monday, June 16, 2008, at 5:11 PM<< Previous | Read comments | Respond | Email link | Next >>
Lately, the headlines on Fort Scott residents being arrested for allegedly purchasing illegal amounts of pseudoephedrine/ephedrine found in over-the-counter decongestant medicines has caught my attention - mainly because my maiden family name was listed.
Don't worry. The embarrassment is already out there. This will not add to it.
I won't judge the "alleged" decisions of people in my family. They are my family. I love them nevertheless. I just really, really do not agree with this particular "alleged" decision. In fact, I think it was just plain idiotic.
However, I think that it provides an excellent opportunity to express my opinion on the matter in writing, as I have already expressed it in person.
I hate drugs. I think they are the stupidest things anyone could ever get involved with. I have never been able to understand how people could do it. I have watched drugs ruin the lives of family members and dear friends, take away everyone and everything they have worked for, put a barrier between them and God, therefore, preventing a good life.
That said, even if you do not do drugs, why would you purchase ingredients for people that are making one of the worst drugs out there, meth?
The ingredients of meth are atrocious. The Kansas Department of Health and Environment (www.kdheks.gov) lists several ingredients such as lye, brake fluid and drain cleaners, all of which I am pretty sure are labeled "poisonous" on them.
Meth is highly addictive and dangerous. KDHE lists short-term side effects such as convulsions, aggressive behavior and paranoia and long-term effects such as liver, brain, lung and kidney damage, and permanent psychological problems, not to mention death.
So let me ask this question -- would you want your kid on this? Then why would you contribute to making it possible for someone to potentially sell it to your kid? Oh, it won't happen to your kid, right? I hope the money was worth it.
It terrifies me to know that my son will be confronted with this as he grows up. It's a far cry from what I was faced with as a kid. I know we will train him in the way he should go (Proverbs 22:6), but lately it seems like meth is all around. What will it be like when he has to deal with it?
Bourbon County charged nine people with one count of unlawful acts, a non-person misdemeanor for purchasing illegal amounts of pseudoephedrine/ephedrine found in over-the-counter decongestant medicines. Yet the manufacturing of meth is a felony. In my personal opinion, people who purchase ingredients for people to make meth should be charged with a felony as well. Yet they seemingly get a slap on the wrist. I see no difference. People who purchase the cold medicine know what the ingredients will be used for.
Besides the threat to our children, which by all means is a topic unto itself, meth manufacturing has negative repercussions on the entire community. It has an overbearing negative affect on the community's overall economic development. It creates hostile environments for children and teaches the next generation to produce a drug that kills people instead of getting a job and becoming productive citizens. It breeds theft and violence. When a meth lab is seized, who do you think pays for the cost of housing the suspects and cleaning up the lab? That's right, you do. According to KCI: The Anti-Meth Site (www.kci.org/meth_info/faq_meth) "Cleanups of labs are extremely resource-intensive and beyond the financial capabilities of most jurisdictions. The average cost of a cleanup is about $5,000 but some cost as much as $150,000. The KCI sites motto is right; Meth destroys lives, families and communities.
The unreasonable logic behind it all simply has to be greed. Greed for money. A sad trade off that is. Is it worth your losing your life? Losing your children? Losing your salvation?
As I and most of the people I know work our rear ends off to make Fort Scott a better place, it sickens me to see people counteract all that hard work by continuing to run themselves and their community into the ground.
LUK 12:15 Then he said to them, "Watch out! Be on your guard against all kinds of greed; a man's life does not consist in the abundance of his possessions."
The Neighborhood Revitalization action team of Fort Scott Community Visioning will host a series of neighborhood clean-up block parties. At those parties, the team will gauge interest in establishing a neighborhood crime/meth watch. If you are interested in establishing a neighborhood watch, contact the NR team at NRfortscott@hotmail.com. Comments Showing comments in chronological order [Show most recent comments first] |
Hot topics Meth Watch(4 ~ 11:51 PM, Aug 24)
Good Night, and Good Luck -- and God Bless
Bad Attitude
Recognizing Your Past
A Plan Perfectly Carried Out
Mailing list
Enter your email address to join our daily headline mailing list: |
There is in my opinion yet another drug not mentioned. Alcohol, has a lot of the same attributes associated with drug use and manufacture. Families are affected a lot in the same way as drugs, yet we still advertise major sporting events and condone alcohol. While this is only my opinion and as I quote from a previous Daily Mail blogger "don't care about your opinion, my blog my rules". Please let this stay as a matter of record that alcohol is a problem also.
Alcohol is a major problem and has had devastating effects on my family as well. Unfortunately, alcohol is legal. Believe me, I wish it were not. (Not that that would take care of the problem - look at where we are with meth.) While deciding not to use alcohol or drugs is a personal choice, with meth and other illegal drugs, we can at least work with local law enforcement to turn in noticed activity. We can do so with alcohol too, if we see issues such as underage drinking.
As far as a previous blogger stating, "don't care about your opinion, my blog my rule", it was an unfortunate response by that person and that issue has been addresses. We welcome our online readers to make comments to our blogs and stories. It is the reason that we have commenting available, to create a living dialogue between the writer and the readers. However, we set the standard that comments stay on topic and are not slanderous, contain profanity or in otherwise bad taste. This is explained in our Letter to the Editor policy printed in our newspaper and in our Terms of Service found on this site. We do not simply take peoples comments down that do not agree with what we have written. What would be the fun in that? I hope this clears up the confusion. Please let me know if you have any other concerns.
Thank you!
Great point theboz makes.
Ms Goodwin so now a different opinion is OK? Where was the editor when one of your colleagues would remove anything that was not in agreement with him?
I am glad to read that the paper may now believe in the freedom of speech. I hope to see some others start to put up some new blogs.
As I responded to the other reader, the response that person received, "don't care about your opinion, my blog my rule", was an unfortunate response by that person posting that blog and was obviously not the opinion of the entire newspaper. We have several bloggers and only one removed comments that should not have. That issue has been addressed.
Myself and the editor try our very best to monitor the Web site, but obviously we can't catch everything right at the time it happens. We do have other responsibilities. As you are not in the newspaper business, I don't imagine you understand everything that goes along with the job. Just as I wouldn't pretend to know how to do whatever job you do better than you. We did catch it, thanks to a reader who called and brought our attention to it, and the ISSUE HAS BEEN ADDRESSED. We always appreciate the feedback.
Now, seeing as this happened several months ago, let's move past this shall we? It's been taken care of. Participate in comments if you wish, just adhere to the standards set forth in the Terms of Service on this site. You have been in violation of the standards before, and banned, because you posted an out-right personal attack containing personal information on the writer that had nothing to do with his posting. Clearly not constructive.
As far as the freedom of speech issue you keep bringing up (and I believe that I have addressed this with you before), you may want to take advantage of Google and brush up on freedom of speech and the First Amendment. We are a newspaper. We are not the United States Congress, which the First Amendment prohibits from violating the freedom of speech. However, the United States Supreme Court does use the Miller Test to determine whether speech or expression is labeled obscene, in which case it is not protected by the First Amendment. See, many entities in society have a "test" or standards to which they adhere to. Your comments, just like letters to the editor, are published at our discretion. I think the standards are pretty lenient - no profanity, no slander, no attacks. Basically, state your opinion and play nice with others. It's really not that hard.
I too hope that others will post new blogs and readers will post new comments. When they stay on topic, it makes for some good conversations.
Please let me know if you have any further concerns. I, and/or the publisher, will be sure to address them with you.
- Tabatha Goodwin, Nevada Daily Mail/The Fort Scott Tribune special projects manager/Webmaster.
when people are worried about drugs we have a drug house at 227 north elm st in nevada missouri. it never gets bothered by the police. a very concerned citizen of vernon county
I also think meth is one of our toughest problems in our rural area. It is as easy to obtain as pot. So the kids don't think it is as bad. This is terrible because it is one of the worst. I hope we can change things in our community. The law enforcement is trying hard, but there is so much. Give them your support.