First National Bank leaderboard
Login | Register
Fair ~ 71°F  
[Nevada Daily Mail]
Nevada, Missouri ~ Sunday, May 18, 2008
Print Email link Respond to editor Read comments (2)

Group home proposal meets with mixed reviews

Tuesday, May 6, 2008

(Photo)
Photo illustration by Ralph Pokorny-- This map shows the approximate location of proposed group homes in Nevada.
Jhan Hurn's proposal last Wednesday to the Nevada Park and Recreation Board to build five six-bedroom group homes adjacent to Marmaduke Park was met with responses ranging from support for the concept with reservations and questions about the location, to outright opposition to any more group homes locating in Nevada.

In response, the parks board agreed to take the proposal under consideration, but postponed making a decision until an unspecified date.

Hurn, executive director of Community Support Services, Joplin, told the parks board that when all five group homes are in operation they would house 30 severely developmentally disabled people and employ about 70 professional and para-professional staff, with an annual budget of $3.75 million. He asked that when the parks board makes its decision that the members take the economic development benefit of the project into account.

"These group homes would provide the same level of care that the Habilitation Center provides," Hurn said.

He told the parks board that most of the people he anticipates serving with these homes would be in wheelchairs, with a few going to the workshop.

"They aren't a problem," he said.

The homes, which would meet all ADA and fire safety requirements, would have 24-hour supervision, with LPN/RN support on-site as required. Staff members would use the facilities of the Habilitation Center to provide additional support for the group homes.

Community Support Services currently operates similar facilities in Carthage and Carl Junction that are located in residential areas.

"The homes look much like any other residence," he said.

Hurn told the board that the reason the company wants to build a cluster of group homes is to make it affordable to provide the level of care that is required for the ICF-MF level of care, which is a Federal Medicaid certification designation.

Hurn said that clustering the homes will allow one LPN to cover multiple homes.

"We are a good fit for this service, as we have 30 years experience in the field," he said.

Tammy Hendren, 600 W. Highland, said that she had concerns about the backgrounds of the people who would be living in the group homes.

She said that her family and other area residents regularly use Marmaduke Park for family reunions and other gatherings.

"We are concerned about people living there with criminal backgrounds," Hendron, who lives directly across Highland Street from the proposed group homes, said.

"We are not planning to take people with criminal backgrounds," Hurn said.

"I think you will find the people in the homes will be well supervised and won't cause any problems. We are good neighbors," Hurn said.

Chris Hendren, Tammy's husband, said that although he is not opposed to the group homes he has concerns about the proposed location -- close to Marmaduke Park, Osage Prairie YMCA and Crowder College.

Hendren said that he grew up with a mentally handicapped brother and he has a good understanding of the challenges involved.

"I think there is a better location," he said.

"Did you only look at city-owned property?" Norlene Hillier, parks board member, asked.

Chris Hendron suggested that there was vacant property directly north of the Habilitation Center that might be an appropriate location for the group homes, since they needed to be close to that facility.

"My question is: Does Nevada want more group homes?" Bill Erwin asked.

He said that he thinks it will hurt property values.

"I personally don't want more group homes or subsidized housing. What we need are tax payers," Erwin said.

"I don't know that my property would be worth as much with that across the street," Chris Hendron said.

When Hurn first approached the city council in 2006 about a location for the group homes, the council directed the city staff to work with him to find a suitable location for the project.

Nevada Planning Director Ron Clow said that he had worked with Hurn to find a location and the city felt that this was the best location for the project. He said that they felt the property closer to the Bowman Building and Crowder College were needed for future expansion of those facilities and to retain the campus atmosphere.

Hurn made a second pitch to the city council during the April 1 meeting, and the council referred him to the parks board for a recommendation on the current proposed location, which is part of Marmaduke Park.


Comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. If you feel that a comment is offensive, please Login or Create an account first, and then you will be able to flag a comment as objectionable.

It still doesn't make any sense to me about taking land away from a park especially when there's so many other places where it can be built.

I often read how larger towns or cities wish they had park land for soccer fields or other things and here we already have it for the future If Nevada doesn't give it away!

It makes alot more sense to me that the houses should be built closer to the Hab Center since they are so dependent on each other the employees and maybe the patients can walk to each building.

If Mr. Hurn is so successful why is he so dependent on the city giving him land??

I believe that a petition should be started to save "Marmaduke Park"!

-- Posted by dandrew on Wed, May 7, 2008, at 9:07 PM

This newspaper coverage missed several key points of this public discussion:

As a person in attendance at that Park Board meeting, I am concerned that several questions and answers about the "supposed" economic benefits of this project were not included in this reporter's article.

When a Park Board member questioned as to where Mr. Hurn would be able to find seventy plus qualified employees..... Mr. Hurn made it very plain that his facility is looking to employee those people that have been trained by and are currently working for The Nevada Habilitation Center. It was stated by that Park Board member that hiring local people that are already employed is a shuffling of people - and that is NOT economic development. Additionally, that personnel shuffling could likely hurt a very stable, long time facility already located in Nevada.

This article did include the fact that Mr. Hurn was questioned - Did he only looked at City owned property? What is missing from this article, is that the answer was Yes - only City owned property was considered. One would surmise that Mr. Hurn expects to make a "deal" with the City - something that would probably not be an option if he were negotiating with a private landowner.

Additionally, when asked about specific arrangements for the purchase of the City owned land, Mr. Hurn concurred that his 2006 proposal included that the City would basically be giving the land away - at 10% each year over a period of ten years.

If we are giving land away and not adding to the current work force, how is that economic development?

I ask that the Nevada City Council and the citizens take a long hard look at all projects that come to the table disguised as "economic development". Sometimes they are not what they appear at first glance.

-- Posted by facts on Tue, May 6, 2008, at 11:52 AM


Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration. If you already have an account on this site, enter your username and password below. Otherwise, click here to register.

Username:

Password:  (Forgot your password?)

Your comments:
Please be respectful of others and try to stay on topic.

Mailing list
Enter your email address to join our daily headline mailing list:
Barnes Company