Letter to the Editor

In opposition of "Blended Blessings"

Friday, May 16, 2008

Dear Editor,

This letter opposes the "Blended Blessings" article by Mr. Richard Carpenter recently published in your paper. He is correct stating the American "racial mix is becoming homogenized. " He is incorrect to cast his thoughts as if this new way of racial miscegenation or amalgamation is better than the old, ancient, Christian way of opposing racially mixed marriages to maintain racial purity. I would like to encourage Mr. Carpenter to rethink his position by giving the facts herein presented an open look. By the way, raw cow's milk is the way the laws of nature and nature's God planned milk to be drunk. It is "live" milk. Simplified, pasteurization "kills the life in the milk" and homogenization helps to destroy lipase necessary for fat digestion. Homogenized and pasteurized milk are the cause of most diseases associated with milk per Dr. William C. Douglass II, MD (page 55 of his The Raw Truth About Milk). Based upon this truth, homogenization of people is a detriment to all races not an improvement as Mr. Carpenter believes.

Mr. Emanuel McLittle, published the following on Jan. 26, 1999. He said, "There is only one way to honestly begin a discussion about interracial marriage. It is mixed up! It is contrary to all known laws of physiology, physics, and nature. It should be obvious to any thinking person that the mixture of different peoples, substances, chemicals, races, and even atoms, weakens all its altered parts ... . Clearly, interracial marriage has become a sick and dangerous faction that threatens to leave us all naked." (The Watchman, page 38,39, Winter 2000). Oh, by the way, Mr. McLittle is a Black Minister. Is he racist? No. He is a purist because that is the nature of God per the Bible and his creation.

McLittle comes from a Biblical viewpoint as do I. The laws of nature and nature's God do not change. Proof. Have you noticed that black birds, crows, and ravens do not mix? The same is true for the Rainbow trout and the Brown trout. It is truth that the Black oak tree produces Black oaks even though right beside it is a White oak and a Red Oak. There is no almagation or hybridization in nature. Why? God his not given animals and plants the abiblity to think their way out of reproducing their kind (Genesis 1:11). Only man can decide or make choices. The Bible tells the reader, of which until recently America was a reader and follower of the Scriptures, that man is to learn from the animals (Job 12:7,8). They have just taught.

Be aware, that the non-white slaves of Egypt brought its decline to the extent that the last Pharoah was a mulatto and that Egypt has never recoved from this ancient miscegenation that began about 800 B.C. The same is true of Greek and the Roman Empires. For example, Pericles in 451 B.C., by law, limited citizenship by racial descent. But within 400 years, the law was changed so that population shifts have been in play since. Neither Rome nor Greece has regained its former glory because it has lost its indigenous polpulation. So how is racial homogenization better? On the other hand, China remains China because its popuation remains Chinese. If a flood of some other race were to overtake China, it would no longer be Chinese China.

Comparing South America to North America, history records South America falls short. Why? South America, is a homogenized pollution. North America is a much more pure population, though changing. Purity verses dilution and homogenization. The results are apparent. South American is what North America will become if miscegenation goes far enough.

The best interest of all races and nations is purity. Miscengation destroys the parent races. Homogenization of milk and people are not part of God's plan for the earth that he created. Remember the ways of the animal and plant kingdoms. The ways of older Nevadans was correct. Do not participate in miscengation.

Gray Clark

Schell City

Views expressed as "letters to the editor" are the sole view of the writer and not the view of this newspaper or its staff. In our view, racial conflict can divide communities, causing us to overlook talents and opportunities that might otherwise help us to grow, both as individuals and communities. Unrecognized and undiscussed, racial division goes unchallenged. Clearly, not everyone shares this view; -- but if we don't talk about it, who will?