Nevada, Missouri · Sunday, November 8, 2009
[SeMissourian.com] Fair ~ 62°F  
High: 77°F ~ Low: 56°F
Print Email link Respond to editor Read comments (4) Share link

Lovinger to step down after 18 years on R-5 board

Friday, December 12, 2008

Dr. Warren Lovinger announced he would not be running for re-election after 18 years on the Nevada R-5 Board of Education. Lovinger said he had enjoyed his time on the board and has a lot of fond memories of fellow board members but that it was time for him to step aside and allow someone else to fill his seat. Filing for his seat and the seat occupied by Chris Ellis will open Tuesday at the districts central office across the street from the high school and will run through Jan. 20.

"I will miss coming to these meetings and being a part of such a fine organization," Lovinger said. "It has truly been a pleasure to work with people such as Larry Forkner who has been on the board for a good long time himself, and Chris Ellis and all the others. My youngest son is in college now and it's time for me to let someone else take my place."

Lovinger introduced Mike McCaffree to the board as one such possible replacement.

Superintendent David Stephens told the board the possible changes in how district employees retirement funds were handled are on hold. Last month Stephens said the district had been contacted regarding the possibility that some employees who were considered exempt from Social Security might have to start contributing but when elected officials including Senator Kit Bond and Congressman Ike Skelton contacted the Washington, D.C., office of the Social Security Administration they were told the national office didn't know what they were referring to and that it appeared the Kansas City office had originated the action.

Stephens said it would be at least 2010 before anything was changed and that it wasn't certain it would even change then.

Jim Chandler presented the board with figures from the Nevada Regional Technical Center. Chandler said that students filled 630 seats at the tech center but a student could be enrolled in more than one program which would cause them to be counted twice.

"We have 630 duplicated students," Chandler said. "Each student may be in more than one program so there are not that many actual students enrolled."

The number of students from other school districts declined. Chandler said the changing graduation requirements could be the problem.

"There has been a drop in the number of students from our partner schools," Chandler said. "The new requirements for graduation raise the credits needed and students might not be able to afford to lose that extra hour traveling back and forth to their school instead of being in a classroom."

Chandler said the construction tech students were working to get the construction house completed by May and were well on their way. He said that there were 27 nursing students, 12 in adult business education and 171 GED students.

The board also discussed changing to the Advanced Education accreditation for the entire district in addition to the current high school and technical center accreditation from North Central. The Advanced Education accreditation is internationally recognized and will highlight the Nevada district as a progressive institution in Missouri. The new accreditation will cost a one-time fee of $750 and $500 per school.


Comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. If you feel that a comment is offensive, please Login or Create an account first, and then you will be able to flag a comment as objectionable. Please also note that those who post comments on nevadadailymail.com may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.

I guess we are hand picking candidates now! How insulting. Again, it looks like we want to remain in control by self-appointing our replacement!

It is time for changes on the school board. Like the breath of freshness with the new superintendent. We need the same on the school board.

-- Posted by crossroads on Mon, Dec 15, 2008, at 7:42 PM

Amen, crossroads!!

-- Posted by bornandraisedhere on Wed, Dec 17, 2008, at 9:28 AM

If you don't have kids in school you shouldn't be allowed on school board, some others ought to follow Lovinger's act, no kids in school get off board.

-- Posted by no more boom on Wed, Dec 17, 2008, at 2:19 PM

I don't think we can be so specific. I would just like to see people willing to serve on the school board that have the interest of all students in mind and not be self serving. The students see right through the adults when special treatment takes place. Just ask the students and/or teachers what has gone on. You need to be ready to hear some things that just might surprise you!

-- Posted by crossroads on Wed, Dec 17, 2008, at 11:11 PM


Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration. If you already have an account on this site, enter your username and password below. Otherwise, click here to register.

Username:

Password:  (Forgot your password?)

Your comments:
Please be respectful of others and try to stay on topic.