Opinion

Peace in the Middle East: "Are we there yet?"

Wednesday, June 8, 2016

Special to the Daily Mail

You may, like I, become repeatedly confused over United States interventions in the Middle East. It seems like today's allies, heavily financed and supplied with armaments, turn out to be next week's opponents! How could that possibly be? Qui bono? Well, certainly the military/industrial complex is thriving as these "never-ending wars" drone on. (Pun intended.)

To help understand the ongoing battles in that part of the world one needs to keep in mind that the "globalists" who are intent on finalizing the New World Order are the men behind the curtain, i.e. those making the decisions. The same happen to also be the ones who have been making the decisions for our own government for decades. (Multiple administrations.)

Ready to be shocked? It is well known that Al Qaeda was formed by our own CIA and is funded by our tax dollars. Osama Bin Laden was, as the CIA admits, an "intelligence asset," though they denied any "direct link" after 9/11. The Obama administration is now openly supporting al Nusrah, which is on the U.S. State Department's list of terrorist organizations! Al Qaeda has been identified as carrying out the 9/11 attacks, and the missing 28 pages of the 9/11 Commission Report are said to document the fact that the 9/11 attacks were funded by Saudi Arabia.

You will note that we never did bomb Saudi Arabia in retaliation for the 9/11 attacks, as we did Afghanistan and Iraq. Perhaps that has to do with the fact that the Bin Laden's and the George Bush's were on very friendly terms, and also that Saudi Arabia has sent hundreds of millions of dollars to the Clinton Foundation, not to mention that it was the Saudi's that President Nixon worked out the "petrodollar" system with via Henry Kissinger.

"State sponsors of terror" are designated as such by our State Department. What does this say about Hillary's acceptance of those millions of dollars from the world's number one sponsor of terrorism, Saudi Arabia? The upcoming election for president is primarily about voting for nationalism, or U.S. sovereignty, vs. voting for globalism and the complete loss of our national freedoms and liberty. I leave it to you to decide which candidates support each.

The State Department has issued a "prohibition against knowingly providing, or attempting or conspiring to provide, material support or resources to, or engaging in transactions with, al-Nusrah Front..." Financing of al-Nusrah, which is al Qaeda, comes in part from Saudi Arabia.

President Obama says he is fighting al-Qaeda via a "war on terrorism," yet he is supporting a terrorist entity in violation of his own legislation. How do we view him and John Kerry (and Hillary) in this context? (The word "traitor" comes to mind.) As Professor Michael Chossudovsky says, "the entire Homeland Security doctrine tumbles."

An international crime syndicate has carried out a "coup de tat" against us and the rest of the world. More and more people are waking up to that fact, and this has slowed the New World Order implementation. Is it too late for our November elections to make any difference? Probably, but I hope and pray that we can recover many of our freedoms that so many patriots paid such high prices to protect. Prayers do work, since "we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places" (Ephesians 6:12). Pray and vote!